As most people know, one of the
important tenets of English family law is establishing what all the assets are
worth – only then can the effect of any proposed financial settlement be truly
understood. In situations where one, or both, of the parties have their own
business it will usually be necessary to ascertain the value of that
business. Through a number of cases I
have assisted on during my seat, I have gained quite a good understanding of
the options in these circumstances. This has been a fascinating
and somewhat unexpected aspect of my work.
For example, a balance sheet valuation is the most straightforward
and involves an assessment of the tangible assets less any money owed on those assets.
This is most appropriate for a business that is merely a sum of its parts –
perhaps a string of investment properties held in a formal company structure
for tax reasons. If the business is a service provider the balance sheet
valuation is not necessarily the most appropriate way to determine the value.
In such a case it is more likely that a forensic accountant would be
involved and the exercise becomes much bigger and more expensive. The accountant reviews the company accounts for
the past few years to understand the nature of the business against the backdrop
of the economic climate specific to the business. The profit a business is making will be
crucial to its value as any potential purchaser would use this as a guide to
what return they could expect to see on their investment. Where possible, a
single joint expert forensic accountant will be appointed by the parties. How to divide the business, if there are not
sufficient assets outside the company to achieve a fair division between
husband and wife, is another complex area on which the forensic accountant can
provide advice.
Seeing all of this at first hand
has really opened my eyes to how different areas of law interact with one
another. It has certainly made me more open-minded about the seats I choose as,
even if I do not think I am likely to specialise in a particular area, I can
now fully understand how useful it is to have a good grounding in a
cross-section of practice groups. It also makes me appreciate working at a full
service law firm, like B P Collins, where colleagues with a range of expertise
are available at a phone call.
Posted by Tina Jeffery, trainee in the family practice group.
Tina Jeffery started her training contract with B P Collins in August 2012 following a long career in the RAF. She holds a BSc and an LLB from the Open University and completed her Legal Practice Course atCity Law School .
Posted by Tina Jeffery, trainee in the family practice group.
Tina Jeffery started her training contract with B P Collins in August 2012 following a long career in the RAF. She holds a BSc and an LLB from the Open University and completed her Legal Practice Course at
No comments:
Post a Comment